It’s Monday…
President Shitshow’s public schedule for…
He’s still in Scotland you can find his schedule here.
So here’s the thing: I was originally planning to put together a grand, overly complicated timeline for #EpsteinFileGate—like full-corkboard-conspiracy mode—after watching Laura “White Nationalist” Ingraham try to rewrite history like she was Doc Brown and Marty McFly.
But now? I’m just focusing on the parts she got wrong. In the clip, she blames the Democrats for “resurrecting” Epstein—as if they dug him up in a media séance—all to distract from DNI Tulsi Gabbard releasing a bunch of bunk claiming that President Obama committed treason.
Yes. That’s the argument. And no, it doesn’t get any less unhinged the second time you hear it.
This is the second time I’ve seen a Fox host suggest that the focus on Epstein came after Tulsi Gabbard released “RussiaGate” files. pic.twitter.com/AL6QHGpDiR
— Acyn (@Acyn) July 25, 2025
Here’s how shit went down; the condensed version.
Sunday, July 6th, 2025:
Axios reported that the DOJ would tell the world in a memo that they found no evidence that Epstein blackmailed people, kept a client list, or was murdered.
🚨 EXCLUSIVE: President Trump’s Justice Department and FBI have concluded they have no evidence that Jeffrey Epstein blackmailed powerful figures, kept a “client list” or was murdered, according to a memo detailing the findings obtained by Axios.https://t.co/Dyt4ycKRuV
— Axios (@axios) July 7, 2025
The DOJ memo PDF has the date “July 2025; it is not a signed memo.
This systematic review revealed no incriminating “client list.” There was also no credible
evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions. We did not
uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties.Consistent with prior disclosures, this review confirmed that Epstein harmed over one
thousand victims. Each suffered unique trauma. Sensitive information relating to these victims is
intertwined throughout the materials. This includes specific details such as victim names and
likenesses, physical descriptions, places of birth, associates, and employment history.One of our highest priorities is combatting child exploitation and bringing justice to
victims. Perpetuating unfounded theories about Epstein serves neither of those ends.To that end, while we have labored to provide the public with maximum information
DOJ memo. July 2025.
regarding Epstein and ensured examination of any evidence in the government’s possession, it is
the determination of the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation that no
further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted
Friday, July 18th, 2025:
DNI Tulsui “Russian Asset” Gabbard announced to the world that she didn’t understand the difference (willingly, most likely) between voting machines and servers.
For months preceding the 2016 election, the Intelligence Community shared a consensus view: Russia lacked the intent and capability to hack U.S. elections.
— DNI Tulsi Gabbard (@DNIGabbard) July 18, 2025
But weeks after President Trump’s historic 2016 victory defeating Hillary Clinton, everything changed. pic.twitter.com/ss6A20yZ7k
They weren’t the only ones attempting to rewrite history…
Holy shit — Markwayne Mullin insists later in the interview again that Obama oversaw actually oversaw the sweetheart deal with Epstein, even after Tapper (accurately) fact-checked him. Yikes. pic.twitter.com/hbR9msyHQs
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) July 27, 2025
The News Blender’s Morning Canary reported on November 2018:
A team of Miami Herald journalists explain how they investigated what spurred them on to their more than year and a half investigation to take a closer look into the case of notorious serial sexual abuser Jeffery Epstein and a Perversion of Justice in their five-page series that hit the public in one fell swoop at 8 am on Wednesday.
In October 2017, as the #MeToo movement spurred a national conversation about the sexual harassment and abuse of women, the Miami Herald had already begun examining the Jeffrey Epstein case.
After the nomination of former Miami U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta to President Trump’s Cabinet in February of that year, the Herald began to take a closer look at what role Acosta played in helping orchestrate a secret plea bargain that prosecutors struck with Epstein in 2007, and finalized in 2008.
Miami Herald
Part One: How a future Trump Cabinet member gave a serial abuser the deal of a lifetime
Part Two: Cops worked to put serial sex abuser in prison. Prosecutors worked to cut him a break
Part Three: Even from jail, sex abuser manipulated the system. His victims were kept in the dark
Sex abuser Jeffery Epstein was surround by powerful people. Here’s a sampling
Timeline: For years, Jeffery Epstein abused teenage girls, police say.
While gallivanting around Scotland, President Everyone Against Me Should Be in Prison took a moment to truth out that well-known threats to national security—Beyoncé and Oprah—should be locked up for the crime of endorsing VP Kamala Harris. Why? Because in the fantasy legal system he just invented, “YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO PAY FOR AN ENDORSEMENT. IT IS TOTALLY ILLEGAL TO DO SO.”
Naturally, no laws were cited. But when you’re writing your own legal code in all caps, who needs Congress?
I checked into this and it’s not illegal to pay for an endorsements. The campaigns that do so, just have to report that they did pay for the endorsements.
Yesterday, our favorite CNN fact-checker Daniel Dale offered both a printed version and taped version of his fact-checking the same claim as me.
The president is calling for the prosecution of Beyoncé…for something that did not happen.
— Daniel Dale (@ddale8) July 27, 2025
It’s not like a dispute of fact. He’s calling for her to be charged with a crime over a nonexistent payment conjured up by supporters on social media. https://t.co/UP5j1gHonc
President Donald Trump over the weekend called for the prosecution of music superstar Beyoncé – based on something that did not actually happen.
[snip]
Federal campaign spending records show a $165,000 payment from the Harris campaign to Beyoncé’s production company, which the campaign listed as a “campaign event production” expense. A Harris campaign spokesperson told Deadline last year that they didn’t pay celebrity endorsers, but were required by law to cover the costs connected to their appearances.
[snip]
Trump went on to criticize other payments from the Harris campaign to organizations connected to prominent endorsers. He asserted without evidence that these payments were inaccurately described in spending records. And he wrongly asserted that it is “TOTALLY ILLEGAL” to pay for political endorsements, though no federal law forbids endorsement payments.
CNN. 07/27/2025.
Dale: I found that this claim about an $11 million payment is imaginary. This claim began circulating among random Trump supporters on social media last year. The WH did not comment when I reached out this time. pic.twitter.com/CzHP8WQkdM
— Acyn (@Acyn) July 28, 2025
It’s crazy town…
We gotta wrap there cause I’m meeting with family I haven’t seen in a few years. They live in different states now. So. I will be covering his video clips of madness tomorrow.
This is an open thread
