Coffee Talk with Tiff

July 1, 2026 12:52 pm EDT Tiff Coffee Talk with Tiff Comments Off on Coffee Talk with Tiff
Image credit: AI-generated illustration created with ChatGPT

It’s Wednesday…

Shitshow’s public schedule for…

Today, Puddle flies aboard the newly minted Air Force Bribe on its maiden voyage to North Dakota.

President Trump will take his new Air Force One for its first flight on Wednesday when he heads to North Dakota to open the Theodore Roosevelt Presidential Library.

The trip is part of the nation’s 250th birthday celebrations. The president will also take a train ride, boarding the BNSF Freedom 250 Train as part of the journey to the library site.

A ceremonial Rough Riders Troop will accompany the presidential motorcade to the Theodore Roosevelt Presidential Library. The group on horseback will evoke the legacy of Theodore Roosevelt and the volunteer cavalry regiment that helped define his public image, a White House official told The Post.

NY Post.com. 07/01/2026.

Puddle told reporters this morning that Americans should be very proud of the newly acquired Air Force Bribe. Declaring it the “bestest” plane ever, he argued the 36-year-old Air Force One was no longer “appropriate” for our Country.

Roll tape.


Constitutional Right Remains Constitutional. Republicans Outraged.

Let’s put a bed sheet over Lady Liberty!

I had to trim the start of the clip for it to upload in WordPress. I couldn’t find it on the YouTubes.

The full tweet reads: Neither the Founding Fathers, nor the authors of the 14th Amendment, nor the millions of Americans who fought and died for their country through the ages intended to establish a nation whose citizenship could so easily be purchased, whether through birth tourism of China’s communist party members or a vast border invasion enabled by faithless presidents. This is the cheap and cheated citizenship the Supreme Court upholds today. The long fight for a constitutional amendment begins now. We must explicitly exclude foreign nationals who break our laws, violate our borders, or exploit loopholes to make their families American citizens.

The Supreme Court’s birthright citizenship decision is wrong, dangerous, and disastrous for American sovereignty and the American people. If we can’t fix it with ordinary legislation, then we must do what the Constitution commands in moments of national crisis: We must amend the Constitution and restore American citizenship. We must again put “We the People” first.

The Supreme Court’s decision constitutionalizing unlimited birthright citizenship for the children of illegal aliens and temporarily present aliens is wrong and disastrous for our sovereignty and the future of our republic.

The decision exposes America to grave national security risks and threatens to erode the integrity of the core of American self-government: citizenship.

Citizenship is more than paperwork issued by the government. It is more than a bureaucratic label that grants access to government programs.

Citizenship is the covenantal bond between a nation and its people.

In a republic like ours, that bond carries enormous weight. In the United States, sovereignty does not belong to a king or a ruling class. It belongs to the American people themselves.

Citizenship defines the legal recognition of who the American people are.

Citizenship defines the political community that governs the United States.

It defines who exercises the sovereign authority of this republic.

But under the Supreme Court’s erroneous interpretation, the Constitution now requires citizenship for anyone who happens to be born on U.S. soil.

Even if their parents entered the country illegally. In other words, even if the American people, the citizenry, have prohibited those parents from entering our territory.

Even if they are here only temporarily as tourists or on student visas.

Even if they have no intention of joining the American nation.

That is a dramatic departure from how serious nations understand citizenship. Under the Supreme Court’s decision, citizenship no longer reflects allegiance or loyalty to a country and its laws. It becomes an administrative status to be seized by interlopers.

This ruling is the final alarm bell.

The bond of American citizenship has slowly eroded through a series of Supreme Court opinions, congressional actions and inactions, and circumstances the Framers of our Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment could not have foreseen.

The result is a constitutional order in which the American people are losing control over the most basic question in any republic: who belongs to the political community that governs the nation.

This has been the central fight of my work in this important year for American national identity. I led an amicus brief in this very case. I convened a hearing on birthright citizenship and the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. I have pressed this issue because citizenship is the threshold question of the republic. If we lose control of citizenship, we lose control of self-government itself.

In the wake of an erroneous Supreme Court ruling like this one, Congress has a duty to examine the Constitution’s text, the historical record, and the policy consequences.

Congress also has the power to respond.

When the Court mistakenly interprets a statute, Congress can amend the statute through bicameralism and presentment.

But when the Court entrenches its mistake as a constitutional command, the remedy must match the injury. Congress can propose an amendment under Article V, and the states can ratify it. That process is purposefully difficult. It requires two-thirds of each chamber of Congress and ratification by three-quarters of the states.

Here, the Supreme Court issued a constitutional ruling. Ordinary legislation cannot repair the damage. A constitutional amendment is now required.

Accordingly, I will be announcing a forthcoming constitutional amendment to restore the sacred bond between American citizens and their government.

That amendment will restore the original American understanding of citizenship. It will restore the right of the American people to define their own political community. And it will ensure that citizenship once again reflects allegiance, permanence, and membership in the American nation.

This amendment accords with the text, history, and tradition of the Constitution and the American conception of citizenship.

It restores the principle embodied in the Civil Rights Act of 1866, the law that formed the basis for the Fourteenth Amendment. As my amicus brief in this case explained, the law contained a citizenship provision establishing that “all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power” would be granted birthright citizenship.

That provision was understood to grant birthright citizenship to children born of parents domiciled in the United States while clearly excluding children born to foreign parents temporarily visiting the United States.

And as my brief recounts, the Fourteenth Amendment was adopted to constitutionalize the Civil Rights Act of 1866. The original American understanding of citizenship was never a suicide pact. It was never a weapon for illegal entry, temporary presence, demographic conquest, or foreign influence.

Left unaddressed, this Supreme Court decision will destroy the republic. A nation that cannot determine who belongs to its political community will lose control of its sovereignty and its unique character and traditions as new generations of unassimilated foreigners are automatically granted citizenship.

We have seen exactly what this process looks like as foreign communists have essentially taken over New York City politics. We cannot allow this Supreme Court decision to consign the rest of our nation to the same fate.

Today is a sad day in the history of our republic. But America and the Constitution have survived for 250 years because each generation has had patriots who, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, valiantly fought back the existential threats this great nation has faced.

Our generation’s existential threat is a hostile takeover through mass migration.

We must, and we will, honor the patriots who came before us by doing our part to ensure we pass on America, the Constitution, and our nation, the real versions, not desiccated husks.

That work begins with restoring the right of the American people to decide who joins the political community that governs the United States and exercises the people’s sovereignty.

At least he knows the Constitution must be amended.

That’s the gist of the cope happening among elected officials.

The most insane take I saw came from editor of the unknown funded Federalist Sean Davis.

Several ways forward here given the choice of Roberts/Barrett to nullify the 14th Amendment and extra-constitutionally replace it with their own language:

That didn’t happen, Sean. They read the plain language of Section 1 of the 14th Amendment:

Congress.gov:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Congress.gov.

The Supreme Court said:

1) Nullification. States issue birth certificates, and they can just stop issuing them to non-citizens. Roberts/Barrett can deal with the fallout and litigate each birth individually.

We’ve already established that birthright citizenship applies to everyone born here. This idea is legally dead on arrival. That won’t stop some red-state governor from trying.

2) Pack the court. If Robert wants to be a politician who writes laws instead of a judge, then he can fight with 10 more unelected legislators in robes.

Ten is a random number. The proposal most often discussed is expanding the Court to 13 justices, matching the 13 federal circuit courts.

3) Deny entry to all pregnant foreigners. 4) Deny entry to all female foreigners.

Because nothing says “strong economy” like declaring half the world’s tourists unwelcome.

5) Require sterilization of all foreign visitors prior to entry.

This is vile. It’s meant to spark outrage. It worked.

6) Dissolution of the Union. A nation which can’t even restrict who gets to be a citizen isn’t a nation.

Good luck to all those red states that depend on blue-state dollars to keep the lights on.

7) Amend the Constitution. This is pointless, because once a judge decides he can rewrite the Constitution at will (as Roberts and Barrett did today), the actual text is meaningless. But this is what most GOP politicians gravitate towards because they are useless.

If you think all these options are not great, understand that that is what happens when unelected judges decide that they are in charge of the country and get to write its laws.

Meanwhile, back in reality…

That wraps this one up. I spent far longer on it than I expected, but sometimes it takes a minute to separate constitutional law from social media fan fiction. I’ve got a couple of back-burner stories I’d still like to get to. Fingers crossed the news gods give them another day.

About the opinions in this article…

Any opinions expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of this website or of the other authors/contributors who write for it.

About Tiff 3715 Articles
Member of the Free Press who is politically homeless and a political junkie.