It’s Wednesday…
President Shitshow’s public schedule for…
Propaganda Barbie is scheduled to hold a press briefing today, where she’s expected to face questions about the newly released Epstein Files—emails confirming that President We-Know-Knew Jeffrey Epstein was a sex trafficker.
Jeffrey Epstein mentioned Trump multiple times in private emails to Ghislaine Maxwell and an author in Trump’s orbit, newly released records show.https://t.co/jX3swUQ5v9
— CNN Breaking News (@cnnbrk) November 12, 2025
In one email dated April 2, 2011, which CNN has independently reviewed, Epstein emailed Maxwell: “i want you to realize that that dog that hasn’t barked is trump.. (REDACTED) spent hours at my house with him ,, he has never once been mentioned. police chief. etc. im 75 % there.”
Maxwell responded: “I have been thinking about that…”
CNN. I can’t link it, it’s the reason the PC crashed. The link is in the tweet.
Here’s the email:
This email from 2011 between Epstein and Maxwell is the smoking gun.
— Aaron Parnas (@AaronParnas) November 12, 2025
There is no reason they would be making things up about Trump spending hours with an Epstein victim years before Trump ran for office. pic.twitter.com/AYtTDbs48S
The GOP ghouls on the Oversight Committee posted this…
Why did Democrats cover up the name when the Estate didn't redact it in the redacted documents provided to the committee?
— Oversight Committee (@GOPoversight) November 12, 2025
It's because this victim, Virginia Giuffre, publicly said that she never witnessed wrongdoing by President Trump.
Democrats are trying to create a fake… https://t.co/vd7gw3kJl0
There are more emails…
Jeffrey Epstein in 2018: "i know how dirty donald is." pic.twitter.com/JYUscFmjdW
— Kyle Griffin (@kylegriffin1) November 12, 2025
I have not had a chance to review the emails.
FYI:
The big question now should be whether @DAGToddBlanche will charge Ghislaine for lying to his face, and move her back into a prison appropriate for sex traffickers.
— emptywheel (check) (@emptywheel) November 12, 2025
Trump Already Confessed He Knew about "the Girls"https://t.co/59egj3rrb5
Speaking of the Epstein Files…
The House is back in action.
Speaker of the House Mike “I Have No Johnson” Johnson announced that he’ll finally swear in Adelita Grijalva—the Democratic representative who won her seat seven weeks ago and is expected to sign the Massie discharge petition, forcing a floor vote to compel the DOJ to release the Epstein files they somehow insist both exist and don’t exist.
Speaker Mike Johnson will swear in Congresswoman-elect Adelita Grijalva tomorrow at 4 p.m. ET, his office says. She'll join me tonight at 9 p.m. ET.
— Kaitlan Collins (@kaitlancollins) November 11, 2025
Speculation abounds that Rep. Nancy Mace is going to remove her name denying the D’s their 218 signatures needed on the petition.
Nancy Mace is pulling her support for the petition to release the Epstein Files, the day before Adelita Grijalva is sworn in…
— Michael O’Brien (@DrOBrienMD) November 12, 2025
Translation: NANCY MACE IS SINGLE HANDEDLY PROTECTING PED*S.@NancyMace has no conscience, only an insatiable appetite for attention.
There are no confirmed reports that she’s gonna pull her name from the petition.
Speaking of the petition Rep. Lauren Boebert is also facing pressure from the cult leader to remove her name.
Trump's call to Boebert was a very early wakeup call.
— Annie Karni (@anniekarni) November 12, 2025
Here’s the thing: Removing their names harms them, voting no, to the release harms them less. So, I don’t foresee the names coming off the petition; I do suspect they will vote no on releasing the files.
Flash News
Propaganda Barbie was already slated to face the press for cleanup duty after a truly bizarre two-part interview with Fox Entertainment’s Laura Ingraham.
In part two, he explained that we need immigrants because, apparently, America just doesn’t have enough “talented” people.
Ingraham: Does that mean the h-1b visa thing will not be a big priority for your administration?
— Acyn (@Acyn) November 12, 2025
Trump: You have to bring in talent
Ingraham: We have plenty of talent
Trump: No, you don’t
Ingraham: We don’t have talented people here? pic.twitter.com/8HopYhqMP1
He also claimed that under his rule, everything is cheaper—apparently in the same universe where he tells the truth.
Trump: That’s their new word: affordability. It's much less expensive under Trump. And I haven't been here long. Nine months is not a long time. But, look at what I have done pic.twitter.com/VBpxOQsuHr
— Acyn (@Acyn) November 12, 2025
So much cheaper our Treasury Secretary has announced that they are going to lower the tariffs on things we don’t grow here in the US.
🚨 BREAKING: In a major development, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent confirms the PRICE OF COFFEE will go down after an impending announcement for tariff relief
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) November 12, 2025
"You're gonna see SUBSTANTIAL announcements over the next couple days for things we don't grow in the U.S. Coffee,… pic.twitter.com/DQwKyDEBn9
Show more =’s “You’re gonna see SUBSTANTIAL announcements over the next couple days for things we don’t grow in the U.S. Coffee, bananas, other fruits, things like that. That will bring the prices down VERY quickly.” HUGE!
Yeah, totally huge that this admin is gonna remove tariffs on items we consume that are now becoming more expensive and harming us.
ffs.
But apparently for MAGA this is all part of the “Trump Effect” and let’s hope the Supreme’s don’t fuck it up.
What part of they have to remove the tariff on coffee to make it less expensive, do you not understand?
— Ann-Tiff-A (@NewsiesNeighbor) November 12, 2025
So, they are telling you, the tariffs are making things cost more.
President Puddle was the first to announce his plan to lower tariffs on coffee.
🚨TRUMP: “The economy is MY THING.”🚨@POTUS told me he’s cutting tariffs to bring COFFEE prices down and expects GAS at $2 a gallon.
— Laura Ingraham (@IngrahamAngle) November 12, 2025
Real relief — not slogans. pic.twitter.com/hrOGKi9NKG
Again, he placed the tariffs, removing harmful ones, isn’t a win, it’s a course correction.
FFS.
It was reported this morning that behind the scenes White House is looking at putting on some “Trump” rallies to tell us, how great his economy is.
White House officials have advised the president not to brush away or outright dismiss that Americans are feeling squeezed by rising prices, they said. They have been actively putting “policy time” — as one of the officials characterized it — on Trump’s schedule with the goal of…
— Alayna Treene (@alaynatreene) November 12, 2025
The president, meanwhile, has been personally frustrated with Americans’ perception of his administration’s handling of the economy and the media’s coverage of it.
— Alayna Treene (@alaynatreene) November 12, 2025
This comes on the heels of President Everything Is Fake insisting he doesn’t believe the polls showing Americans are unhappy with his handling of inflation.
Trump blames "fake" polls for his bad inflation numbers (-26 net approval), but these same polls had him winning on inflation by 9 pt over Harris.
— (((Harry Enten))) (@ForecasterEnten) November 12, 2025
The polls aren't fake; the American have turned against Trump.
Even if polls are off like 2024, Trump is at -24 pts on inflation. pic.twitter.com/g4fdno8IQo
And last but not least…
The House Rules committee met to discuss the Senate Spending bill that will reopen the government if passed. One section is facing backlash…
@grok what is the phone record provision they are talking about?
— Scotthazelberg (@scotthazelberg1) November 12, 2025
Just to clarify does this provision say the Senators can sue the government for something the providers failed to do? And is it specific to just Senators?
— Ann-Tiff-A (@NewsiesNeighbor) November 12, 2025
This is the provision. https://t.co/B8uJDYNqiB
— Ann-Tiff-A (@NewsiesNeighbor) November 12, 2025
It seems clear it means the Senators can sue the government…
Yes? pic.twitter.com/nAQEWEWZ36
thank you.
— Ann-Tiff-A (@NewsiesNeighbor) November 12, 2025
No worries, though. Those big mad Republican R’s griping about the bullshit provision are still going to vote for the bill—and promise to “deal with it later.” I shared the GROK exchange for a reason beyond that garbage clause the eight Democratic senators claim they “didn’t know” was in there. It’s to show that AI is fast and flashy, but not reliable as a source on its own. It’s like Wikipedia—a place to start, not the whole story.
This is an open thread
