— Newshound (@NewsiesNeighbor) January 3, 2020
As the News Blender reported on Friday morning at the direction of the President of the United States, Donald Trump, the military targeted and killed Iranian general *Qasem Soleimani, also spelled Qassim Suleimani, head of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Quds Force.
*I’m not exactly sure what is the correct spelling I will be using both*
The President has responded to the military operation issuing 5 tweets on Friday morning.
Iran never won a war, but never lost a negotiation!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 3, 2020
While the tweet reads as if the President is admitting he failed to negotiate with Iran, since the President does not in fact admit failure he is likely referring to the Iran Deal, that the Obama Administration approved, that President Trump withdrew from.
General Qassem Soleimani has killed or badly wounded thousands of Americans over an extended period of time, and was plotting to kill many more…but got caught! He was directly and indirectly responsible for the death of millions of people, including the recent large number….
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 3, 2020
….of PROTESTERS killed in Iran itself. While Iran will never be able to properly admit it, Soleimani was both hated and feared within the country. They are not nearly as saddened as the leaders will let the outside world believe. He should have been taken out many years ago!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 3, 2020
The United States has paid Iraq Billions of Dollars a year, for many years. That is on top of all else we have done for them. The people of Iraq don’t want to be dominated & controlled by Iran, but ultimately, that is their choice. Over the last 15 years, Iran has gained more….
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 3, 2020
….and more control over Iraq, and the people of Iraq are not happy with that. It will never end well!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 3, 2020
The Defense Department issued a statement announcing the death of *Soleimani, stating that Soleimani was “actively developing plans to attack American diplomats and service members in Iraq and throughout the region.”
The statement went on to say, “He had orchestrated attacks on coalition bases in Iraq over the last several months – including the attack on December 27th – culminating in the death and wounding of additional American and Iraqi personnel. General Soleimani also approved the attacks on the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad that took place this week.”
The strike they say was aimed at deterring future Iranian attack plans.
The President of Iran Hassan Rouhani vowed revenge on the attack via Twitter.
The flag of General Soleimani in defense of the country’s territorial integrity and the fight against terrorism and extremism in the region will be raised, and the path of resistance to US excesses will continue. The great nation of Iran will take revenge for this heinous crime.
— Hassan Rouhani (@HassanRouhani) January 3, 2020
The New York Times reported that airstrike took place at Baghdad International Airport and was carried out by drone.
Along with the *Suleimani the airstrike killed “several officials from Iraqi militias backed by Tehran when an American MQ-9 Reaper drone fired missiles into a convoy that was leaving the airport.”
Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei issued a statement regarding the death calling for three days of mourning before Iran retaliates.
His departure to God does not end his path or his mission, but a forceful revenge awaits the criminals who have his blood and the blood of the other martyrs last night on their hands.
Khamenei via New York Times 1/2, 1/3, 2020.
Fox News correspondent Gillian Turner is reporting via Twitter that Iraq’s Parliament has vowed to remove U.S. presence in Iraq in the wake of the airstrike.
BREAKING: Iraq’s Parliament vows to eliminate the US presence in #Iraq — deputy parliament speaker says they’ll hold an emergency meeting & make “decisive decisions that put an end to US presence inside Iraq”
— Gillian Turner (@GillianHTurner) January 3, 2020
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo issued several tweets regarding the airstrike.
Iraqis — Iraqis — dancing in the street for freedom; thankful that General Soleimani is no more. pic.twitter.com/huFcae3ap4
— Secretary Pompeo (@SecPompeo) January 3, 2020
I spoke today with Chinese Politburo Member Yang Jiechi to discuss @realDonaldTrump‘s decision to eliminate Soleimani in response to imminent threats to American lives. I reiterated our commitment to de-escalation.
— Secretary Pompeo (@SecPompeo) January 3, 2020
Discussed with @DominicRaab the recent decision to take defensive action to eliminate Qassem Soleimani. Thankful that our allies recognize the continuing aggressive threats posed by the Iranian Quds Force. The U.S. remains committed to de-escalation.
— Secretary Pompeo (@SecPompeo) January 3, 2020
Spoke with @HeikoMaas about @realDonaldTrump‘s decision to take defensive action to eliminate Qassem Soleimani. Germany is also concerned over the Iranian regime’s continued military provocations. The U.S. remains committed to de-escalation.
— Secretary Pompeo (@SecPompeo) January 3, 2020
Spoke with #France‘s Jean-Yves Le Drian about @realDonaldTrump‘s decision to take action to kill Qassem Soleimani. Countering the Iranian regime’s malign activity is a shared priority with our European allies. Our resolve to protect our people & our interests is unwavering.
— Secretary Pompeo (@SecPompeo) January 3, 2020
#Pakistan‘s Chief of Staff General Bajwa and I spoke today about U.S. defensive action to kill Qassem Soleimani. The #Iran regime’s actions in the region are destabilizing and our resolve in protecting American interests, personnel, facilities, and partners will not waver.
— Secretary Pompeo (@SecPompeo) January 3, 2020
Spoke with Afghan President @AshrafGhani on @realDonaldTrump‘s decision to kill Qassem Soleimani to protect American lives at stake. The Iranian regime’s actions are a source of instability throughout the region. The U.S. will protect its people and its interests.
— Secretary Pompeo (@SecPompeo) January 3, 2020
Unless you are murdered by Saudi Arabia or you happen to be U.S. allies, the Kurds. Sorry I know that’s not objective nor is it necessary in this context, but these kinds of statements, “we will protect its people,” bug the crap out of me, when it’s not a blanket protection of U.S. people, instead it’s a lot of pounding the chest and ignoring the real cost of these actions.
Assassinating Soleimani is not an act of de-escalation. Quite the opposite. pic.twitter.com/rrKPqAN4Xk
— Trey Yingst (@TreyYingst) January 3, 2020
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) issued a statement regarding the airstrike late Thursday.
American leaders’ highest priority is to protect American lives and interests. But we cannot put the lives of American servicemembers, diplomats and others further at risk by engaging in provocative and disproportionate actions. Tonight’s airstrike risks provoking further dangerous escalation of violence. America – and the world – cannot afford to have tensions escalate to the point of no return.
The Administration has conducted tonight’s strikes in Iraq targeting high-level Iranian military officials and killing Iranian Quds Force Commander Qasem Soleimani without an Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) against Iran. Further, this action was taken without the consultation of the Congress.
Speaker.gov. 1/2/2020.
Senator Lindsey Graham told Fox & Friends that he was briefed while he was visiting Florida.
GRAHAM on Fox & Friends: " I was briefed about the potential operation when i was down in florida. I appreciate being brought into the orbit. I really appreciate President Trump letting the world know you cannot kill an american without impunity."
— Alan He (@alanhe) January 3, 2020
For What It’s Worth.
I could fill the thread with past tweets from President Trump regarding former President Obama and his thoughts that then-President Obama would in fact start war with Iran to win reelection.
Instead of tweets, here is a video of then-businessman Trump issuing a statement regarding those same tweeted thoughts.
😠👿😡This was in 2011 (Deleted from trump's vlog by his aids) ..
— Diane🌊🧡Resists🧡🌊 (@D_resists) January 3, 2020
Your thoughts – 🤦♀️ pic.twitter.com/n7SOLOFfCg
You can view his past tweets @ Trump Twitter Archive.
Democratic primary candidate for President former Vice President Joe Biden issued a statement regarding the airstrike.
My statement on the killing of Qassem Soleimani. pic.twitter.com/4Q9tlLAYFB
— Joe Biden (@JoeBiden) January 3, 2020
Our world has been set on edge by an erratic, unstable, and dangerously incompetent commander in chief. The stakes could not be higher. Every day that Donald Trump directs American national security is a dangerous day for the United States and the world. pic.twitter.com/EoWjabVp3u
— Joe Biden (@JoeBiden) January 3, 2020
Other Democratic hopefuls also issued statements.
Pete Buttigieg on the killing of Qassim Suleimani: “there are serious questions about how this decision was made…As a former military intelligence officer on the ground in Afghanistan, I was trained to ask the hard questions before acting. A Commander-in-Chief must do the same” pic.twitter.com/lC4kGkAYRB
— DJ Judd (@DJJudd) January 3, 2020
I'll be addressing Trump's dangerous escalation in the Middle East at 1 p.m. ET/12 p.m. CT. Tune in here: https://t.co/rJKqDWwFmb
— Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) January 3, 2020
Soleimani was a murderer, responsible for the deaths of thousands, including hundreds of Americans. But this reckless move escalates the situation with Iran and increases the likelihood of more deaths and new Middle East conflict. Our priority must be to avoid another costly war.
— Elizabeth Warren (@ewarren) January 3, 2020
As the President typically does following several foreign policy tweets he tweeted 4 more and has retweeted 18 times.
This is a great book, a must read! https://t.co/bwpNVi5hpY
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 3, 2020
Apparently irony will not die.
Christopher Bedford, The Federalist Senior Editor. “There is NOTHING NEW in these Emails at all that’s been discovered. It’s exactly what we knew before, which is that the White House & political figures wanted to cut off aid, Trump wanted to question aid to a number of….
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 3, 2020
….different places that he thought were wasteful, and the career staff, as they always do, pushed back, and nade s million excuses as to why they could not possibly stop spending U.S.taxpayer money. There was a back & forth over the legal arguments, & the W.H. decision was….q
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 3, 2020
….followed, and then it was withdrawn. The Democrats argument for impeachment has not gotten stronger over the last few weeks. As Senator Josh Hawley just said, he’s going to enter a Motion to Dismiss the Impeachment Trial because it’s never actually been brought to trial.”
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 3, 2020
He has deleted the threaded tweets only to reissue them.
Christopher Bedford, The Federalist Senior Editor. “There is NOTHING NEW in these Emails at all that’s been discovered. It’s exactly what we knew before, which is that the White House & political figures wanted to cut off aid, Trump wanted to question aid to a number of….
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 3, 2020
….different places that he thought were wasteful, and the career staff, as they always do, pushed back, and made a million excuses as to why they could not possibly stop spending U.S. taxpayer money. There was a back & forth over the legal arguments, & the W.H. decision was….
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 3, 2020
….followed, and then it was withdrawn. The Democrats argument for impeachment has not gotten stronger over the last few weeks. As Senator Josh Hawley just said, he’s going to enter a Motion to Dismiss the Impeachment Trial because it’s never actually been brought to trial.”
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 3, 2020
As was mentioned in Thursday’s Trump Tweet thread, Just Security reported yesterday that they had obtained unredacted versions of emails regarding Ukraine military aid.
EXCLUSIVE: @just_security has obtained unredacted versions of Trump administration emails about Ukraine aid.
— Just Security (@just_security) January 2, 2020
They show the Pentagon repeatedly sounded the alarm that the freeze on funding was in violation of the law.@K8brannen reports:https://t.co/hDce01mK5E
From the article published by Just Security.
Last month, a court ordered the government to release almost 300 pages of emails to the Center for Public Integrity in response to a FOIA lawsuit. It released a first batch on Dec. 12, and then a second installment on Dec. 20, including Duffey’s email, but that document, along with several others, were partially or completely blacked out.
Since then, Just Security has viewed unredacted copies of these emails, which begin in June and end in early October. Together, they tell the behind-the-scenes story of the defense and budget officials who had to carry out the president’s unexplained hold on military aid to Ukraine.
Just Security 1/2/20.
According to the article:
What is clear is that it all came down to the president and what he wanted; no one else appears to have supported his position. Although the pretext for the hold was that some sort of policy review was taking place, the emails make no mention of that actually happening. Instead, officials were anxiously waiting for the president to be convinced that the hold was a bad idea. And while the situation continued throughout the summer, senior defense officials were searching for legal guidance, worried they would be blamed should the hold be lifted too late to actually spend all of the money, which would violate the law.
The emails also reveal key decision points, moments when senior officials hoped the hold might be lifted. This includes Vice President Mike Pence’s September meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, which a senior defense official expected would resolve the funding issue, raising the question: Why? What was supposed to come out of that meeting that would pave the way for Trump to lift the hold? What was Pence expected to communicate?
Just Security 1/2/20.
The case for Impeachment has already been made, the President is now at this moment Impeached. The question left for the Senators is do they remove the now Impeached President or do they allow him to remain in power.
This post will be updated within reason.
2 Trackbacks / Pingbacks
Comments are closed.